By Any Other Name…

Flags of the United Nations.

Throughout history the world has seen numerous geopolitical events involving genocide, the systematic killing of one group based on differences in race, ethnicity, religion, etc. Some examples include

Name Year Victims Killed
The Armenian genocide 1915 – 1917 800,000 – 1,000,000
The Cambodian genocide 1975 – 1979 1,000,000 – 3,000,000
The Holocaust 1941 – 1945 4,000,000 – 7,000 000
The Rwandan genocide 1994 400,000 – 800,000

Other examples include the Indigenous genocide in America, the Aboriginal genocide in Australia, the Romani genocide in Germany, and the Greek genocide in Turkey. Throughout history, one group of people has tried to exterminate another group of people . . . by any means necessary. In the year 2024, one would assume that a world that had witnessed the horror of genocide would have learned how to spot it, intervene, and stop it. Disturbingly, that is not the case. Let’s take a few moments and use sociology to better understand genocide.

German concentration camp, Auschwitz.
German concentration camp, Auschwitz.

One group hating another doesn’t just happen randomly. It is built on a foundation of prejudice and discrimination. While often used interchangeably, these concepts are not the same. Prejudice involves a preconceived judgment or opinion of other people and races that leads to preferring one kind of person over another. On the other hand, discrimination is defined as unfair or differential treatment of individuals and groups based on race and ethnicity. In essence, prejudice is what you think about someone, and discrimination is the action you take against them. Without question, groups that commit genocide are operating based on a certain opinion of their victims and are acting against them.

If the two groups in question are equal in society, then the impact of prejudice and discrimination may be nullified. But rarely is genocide about equal groups. Typically, there is inequality with one side being part of the majority group that controls the economic, social, and political power and resources, and the other being part of the minority group, with significantly less economic, social, and political power and resources. Often the majority group exploits society’s minority group in what is called internal colonialism. This involves treating the minority group unfairly economically, politically, and socially. In short, forcing members of the minority group to live in conditions below what the majority group would want for their people.

To continue reading, please log in or subscribe.